Unfulfilled Aachen john demands hooker refund

An Aachen man who failed to reach orgasm during his €30 ($44) session with a prostitute has accused her of unfairly taking his money, according to a bemused police report on Wednesday.

The john and the prostitute agreed on the fee for the 20-minute service in an Aachen alley, but failed to pick a specific goal for their undertaking, the police report said. When the man did not have an orgasm, he accused the woman of having a faulty “egg timer” that went off before he could. He then demanded his money back.

When the prostitute refused to cough up the cash, he called the police. However, the officers were unable to mediate the situation successfully, and the man filed charges against the woman.

“The criminal case for fraud will now proceed, as the fronts remain hardened,” the reported concluded.

It’s my view that he was paying for the time not an expectation of concluded service. Considering that the contract was verbal, it’s hard to determine whether or not she was unable keep her end of the bargain. Given the service, there is a certain expectation.

It would be cost-prohibitive (valuing time as money) to agree to anything except a set time for service, however, especially given the fact that such a service requires payment up-front. This isn’t an auto mechanic who can hold your vehicle as collateral in case you cannot pay for the service provided.

* I couldn’t resist -it was either hard or rigid that were going to get abused here.

Related posts:

1. All to stop syphilis
2. I got my ACLU card the other day, yo.
3. Compromises, compromises, compromises… the word that makes US politics tick.
4. Jane Austen’s Zombies and other stuff
5. Q: Is turnabout fairplay? A: Wrong question.